The Peninsula Foundation
  • Regions
  • Experts
  • Research & Publications
  • Events
  • Conferences
  • About Us
    • Mission
    • Governance
      • Managing Trustees
      • Governing Council
    • TPF Team
    • Partners
    • Internships
    • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
The Peninsula Foundation
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
  • Regions
  • Experts
  • Research & Publications
  • Events
  • Conferences
  • About Us
    • Mission
    • Governance
      • Managing Trustees
      • Governing Council
    • TPF Team
    • Partners
    • Internships
    • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Aerospace and Defence
  • India
  • Military Power & Modernisation
  • National Security & Foreign Policy
  • Opinion/Commentary
  • Regions

How the newly inducted IAF Chinook heavy-lift helicopters provide huge versatility in operations

  • M Matheswaran
  • May 22, 2019
  • No comments
  • 5 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

M Matheswaran                                                                                                 May 22, 2019/Opinion

The Indian Air Force inducted the first batch of four Boeing C-47 F(I) Chinook helicopters last month into its inventory. These are part of the order for fifteen heavy lift helicopters. With a payload capability of 10 tonnes and a significantly good high altitude performance, the Chinooks fill a long-felt gap in IAF’s heavy lift helicopter capability. For long the IAF had depended solely on its small fleet of Russian built Mi-26 helicopter, which is still the world’s largest and heaviest payload helicopter. The Mi-26, with an enormous payload capability of 20 tonnes, had provided yeoman service for more than two decades.

Starting with a fleet of four aircraft, the Mi-26 has played extensive role in meeting major airlift requirements of material, machinery, and men, for the military and civil administration in the Himalayan border regions.With one aircraft having crashed few years ago, the surviving fleet had been hampered by maintenance and technical support problems, virtually bringing to halt the heavy heli-lift capability of the IAF. Besides, increasing emphasis on infrastructure build-up in the border regions has highlighted the importance of heli-lift capabilities for both the IAF and the Indian Army. This is what prompted the IAF to look out for building and enhancing its heli-lift capabilities in the heavy-segment.

India’s borderlands, dominated by the mighty Himalayan ranges, are unique, treacherous, and the most demanding in the world. The need to operate at altitudes higher than 20000 ft on regular basis is unique to India, and is a challenge to most helicopters designed in the West and Russia. Operations in Indian environment puts gruelling demands on these helicopters. High altitude performance in other parts of the world is at less than 20000ft, in fact, it would average between 5000 and 10000 ft, with exceptions at 15000 ft. In India, 20000 ft operations would be routine in the Himalayan stretches and valleys all across our nearly 4000 km long border in the north and north-west. High altitude operations put severe demands on the engine, has a drastic reduction in effective payload, and has adverse impact on total technical life. These will need to be addressed by appropriate technical enhancements that are fairly expensive as well.

Indian MOD signed the contract with M/s Boeing in Sep 2015 for supply of 15 CH-47F(I) Chinook Helicopters. The contract is for USD 1.1 billion, with an option clause for further seven aircraft. All 15 aircraft are planned to be supplied before March, 2020. It is almost certain that the option clause would be exercised. The first aircraft was handed over in a ceremony at the manufacturer’s production facility in Philadelphia on Feb 1 st , and the first batch of four were shipped out to Mundra Port in Gujarat. The four were then assembled and integrated into fully operational helicopters at the IAF base in Chandigarh and inducted on the 25 th March. Some of the specialist systems, self-protection systems and EW equipment are contracted through the FMS (Foreign Military Sales) procedure.

While the payload capability is only half that of the Mi-26 helicopter, the Chinook provides huge versatility in operations. The IAF version is the CH-47 F(I), which is the latest and advanced version of the Chinook, designed more than 50 years ago in 1962. The IAF aircraft is upgraded with new generation avionics and flight control systems that make the aircraft capable of very precise and versatile operations during day and night. The Chinook’s twin-rotor design gives it good agility and stability in high altitude operations. Its advanced mission computer and the DAFCS (Digital Automatic Flight Control System) allows the pilot to feed in the complete mission profile and fly automatically and with hover precision in one foot increments vertically and laterally. The CH-47 F(I) is an advanced multi mission helicopter with the true multi-role, vertical-lift capability. It contains a fully integrated, digital cockpit management system, Common Aviation Architecture Cockpit and advanced cargo-handling capabilities that complement the aircraft’s mission performance and handling characteristics. Its primary role will be for transportation of troops, artillery, equipment, and fuel. The army is particularly keen on the Chinook heavy heli-lift capability for transportation and deployment of its recently procured M-777 Ultra-Light howitzer artillery guns in the Himalayan border regions with China.

As opposed to the small fleet of three Mi-26 helicopters, the larger fleet size of the CH- 47 F(I) would provide the IAF immense flexibility and availability of aircraft for a variety of tasks. It will provide a boost to the construction of infrastructure and border road projects, long overdue. Border Roads Organisation would get a fillip to its long-delayed road construction projects in the north-east. Our continued requirements of aerial maintenance in remote regions will be better served with this new capability, as also for critical needs of HADR operations, in missions for transportation of relief supplies, and evacuation of refugees. The IAF plans to deploy the two squadrons, one in the Western sector in Himachal Pradesh and adjoining Himalayan regions, and the other in the East sector in Assam/Arunachal Pradesh.

The Chinook acquisition was also accompanied by acquisition of the Apache attack helicopter, also from Boeing. Both contracts, worth together over USD 3.5 billion, were signed on the same day on 28 Sep 2015. Both are also a combination of DCS (Direct Commercial Sales) and FMS (Foreign Military Sales) processes. The two inductions have followed a series of procurements from the USA, mostly through the FMS route. Having started with the first major defence deal in 2008, the Indo-USA defence business is likely to touch a whopping USD 18 billion by the end of 2019. Most of these acquisitions are through FMS and are virtually replacing the earlier Russian fleets: Apache replacing the Mi-35, Chinook replacing Mi-26, Sikorsky MH-60 Romeo replacing the Kamov in the Navy, with the likelihood of 110 NMRH to follow; this is a sort of indirect CAATSA in play.
It is important for India to realise that while many of these acquisitions have given significant teeth to Indian operational capability, in terms of business it has been huge business to the US companies with very little to show for India in 3 terms of Technology transfer or industrial gain in terms of manufacture or co-design and co- development.

The CAG report number 3 of 2019 comes down heavily on these acquisitions. It castigates the MOD and the IAF for procedural lapses, long drawn out acquisition processes, and more importantly of having skewed the QRs in such a way that only Chinook and Apache would have been successful. That’s a serious indictment. However, India will do well to remember that major procurements like the Apache and the Chinook at huge costs, while meeting the IAF’s operational requirements, should also be leveraged to benefit India’s larger strategic interests of technology acquisition, industrial capability, global partnerships, and of course, strengthening US-India strategic partnership. It needs to be a win-win for both.

The author is retired Air Marshal and former Deputy Chief of Integrated Defence Staff. He is the founding Chairman and President of The Peninsula Foundation, Chennai. Views expressed are personal. 

This article was published earlier in Financial Express.

Image Credit.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
Related Topics
  • Apache
  • Boeing
  • Chinook
  • HADR
  • IAF
M Matheswaran

Air Marshal M Matheswaran (Retd) is the founder President of TPF. He is an Air force veteran and was the Deputy Chief of Integrated Defence Staff, MOD, in his last appointment. He specialises in Defence and Aerospace, National Security and Geopolitics, Military Strategy and War studies, and China's aerospace power.

Previous Article
  • Democracy & Governance
  • Elections and Policies
  • Policy Analysis

India Elections 2019: Electoral Bonds Scheme Hinders Effective Policymaking

  • Renuka Paul
  • May 22, 2019
View Post
Next Article
  • China
  • Opinion/Commentary
  • Politics & Society
  • Regions

Chinese Lesson: Paying the Price for Uprightness

  • Mohan Guruswamy
  • May 22, 2019
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Opinion/Commentary
  • Terrorism

Kashmir at a Crossroads: Pahalgam Terror Attack Amid Democratic Gains

  • Imran Khurshid
  • May 2, 2025
View Post
  • International & Transnational Affairs
  • Opinion/Commentary
  • USA

Trump and Musk, Canada, Panama and Greenland, an old Story

  • Thierry Meyssan
  • January 19, 2025
View Post
  • Conflict Resolution
  • International & Transnational Affairs
  • Military Power & Modernisation
  • TPF Analysis
  • War, Peace, and Diplomacy

Guerrilla Air Defence: Strategy of the Underdog

  • Anil Khosla
  • January 14, 2025
View Post
  • Conflict Resolution
  • International & Transnational Affairs
  • Israel-Palestine Conflict
  • Israel's Genocide
  • Lebanon
  • Opinion/Commentary
  • Syria
  • Terrorism
  • West Asia and the Middle East

The End of Pluralism in the Middle East

  • Craig Murray
  • December 20, 2024
View Post
  • Democracy & Governance
  • Elections and Policies
  • International & Transnational Affairs
  • Opinion/Commentary
  • USA

An Outside View of the US 2024 Presidential Election

  • Deborah Veneziale
  • November 20, 2024
View Post
  • Borders & Borderlands
  • Culture & Civilization
  • Opinion/Commentary
  • Science and Technology
  • War, Peace, and Diplomacy

China and the Sunset of the International Liberal Order

  • Alfredo Toro Hardy
  • November 19, 2024
View Post
  • Freedom & Equality
  • Human Dignity & Equality
  • Human Rights
  • Opinion/Commentary
  • Politics & Society
  • Racism and Society
  • Revolutions

The Cultural Revolution from the Right: From the Democratic Concept of the People to its Ethnic-religious Understanding

  • Andreas Herberg-Rothe
  • November 19, 2024
View Post
  • Civil Wars
  • Human Rights
  • International & Transnational Affairs
  • Israel-Palestine Conflict
  • Israel's Apartheid
  • Israel's Genocide
  • TPF Analysis
  • War, Peace, and Diplomacy

Crimson Cows and Indian Sensibilities

  • Deepak Sinha
  • November 12, 2024

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Captcha loading...

Categories
Write for Us
Tweets by TPF_Chennai
Focus Areas
  • Democracy & Governance
  • International & Transnational Affairs
  • Science, Technology & Security
  • Transformational Paradigms
More From TPF
  • Partners
  • Donate Now
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Copyright © 2021 | The Peninsula Foundation | All Rights reserved | TPF Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

en English
af Afrikaansar Arabicbn Bengalizh-CN Chinese (Simplified)nl Dutchen Englishtl Filipinofr Frenchde Germanel Greekiw Hebrewhi Hindiid Indonesianit Italianja Japanesekn Kannadako Koreanms Malayml Malayalammr Marathifa Persianpt Portugueseru Russianes Spanishta Tamilte Teluguvi Vietnamese